Review of Children in Out-of-Home Care More than 1 Year 624-05-15-80-05-10

(Revised 4/3/2023 ML #3716)

View Archives

 

 

The Adoption and Safe Families Act requires that we look at cases to develop an alternate permanency plan for a child that cannot be reunified. Consider the age of the child and whether the goal is realistic if it has not yet been achieved. Consider also if concurrent planning is appropriate; and, if services the family needs have been provided. The basic premise is that the child needs permanency. The longer a child has been in care, the less chance they have for reunification with their family or adoption. If concurrent permanency goals are appropriate for the circumstances surrounding the case, then simultaneous efforts must be made to achieve the goals. Rationale for choosing the goals and efforts made toward achievement must be documented in the case record.

 

Suggested Questions to ask at review of longer term placement.

1. What reasons necessitated placement?

    

2. What is the permanent planning goal for this child?

    

3. Is the plan realistic?

    

4. What is the current family situation, what conditions are preventing return of the child (absence, condition, conduct). What do they want in a plan?

    

5. Is there a concurrent plan?

    

6. What is the current situation of the child? Where are his/her psychological ties, what does he/she want in a plan?

    

7. What is the current situation of foster parents, relatives or others who have been caring for the child? What is the role and planning process for the relatives and foster parents? How do they fit into the permanent plan?

    

8. What is the independent living plan for youth 16 and over?

    

9. Do safety issues prevent child’s return home?